Skip to main content

Stupidity At War

Me: I can't think of anything to say that doesn't make me sound like a 70s anti-war hippie... i wish this was something we could solve digitally or financially or something...

1: Yeah, I don’t like war either, I just don’t understand how someone can be so stupid.

Me: That's a strongly subjective statement. (also extremely vague. Am I the person who is "so stupid"? Not likely, but if so, why???)

1: Well, yeah, it’s subjective of course. And obviously, [National Leader P].

2: Power makes anyone stupid.

Me: I doubt it's stupidity. You don't acquire power by being stupid, our recent president's bearing notwithstanding - it could have been one hell of an act. You acquire power by being selfish, and every war or invasion I've ever researched has had a significant profit margin for someone very close to the people in charge. That's not a stupid reason to go to war - although it's intensely selfish.

I don't agree with the morals and values of the people who choose to hurt others. But there's no reason to for me to act as if I'm somehow different in quality from them - I am just as selfish in how i choose to support my own values.

And it's an assumption of mine that a war or invasion is "always" driven my profit. Someone always profits, but for instance in the case of 9/11, most supporters of the war in our country absolved themselves of the killing of 100,000 civilians of another country by claiming it to be "self-defense". Again, not something i agree with - especially because each parent killed created an enemy out of their children.

It's important to mention also, same as the US political climate preceding WWII, a not-insignifcant political faction in our country implicitly (or perhaps explicitly) supports [the instigative nation] now. That's part of why it's such a tricky conversation to have without devolving into insults and rhetorical quibbles.

I don't feel like it's too much of a stretch to say that the politics of the US drives the stability of the world. Before we start calling other national leaders stupid, we need to get our country put back together at every level - the duct tape and baling wire solutions of 'more patriotism' and 'there are no problems here' and 'common external enemy' and 'if I'm not aware of it, it's not happening' can only go so far against the national rising inequality and local corporate monopolies....
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

interdependence and apples

》　It really saddens me that it only takes one bad apple to ruin a bunch for most people. The reason the saying is, "one bad apple ruins the bushel/barrel" is that because of the way apples rot, they emit a gas that causes all the apples around them to rot as well. When talking about how people interact, a person did not develop their personality by accident or by chance; they were enabled by so many people that there's almost no way of picking out any particular influence. For instance, if you read the book about Trump by his niece, she points out that nearly every troubling behavior he has was initially caused by the extremely high desire he had to earn his own father's affection, and was subsequently reinforced by celebrity-dom and the trappings of wealth. Similarly MLK Jr., who was a reverend for some time before he became a celebrity, was strongly influenced by his own understanding of the Word of God and the unconditional support of his loved ones, ev...
Post a Comment
Read more

the value of exploitation

》　 Income of black slaves? You clearly don’t realize slavery almost abolished itself because of hoe **nonprofitable** it was until the cotton jin Growing cotton has never profited from slavery. In fact, paid laborers were more profitable than slave laborers even after the cotton gin was created; although the question of whether the paid laborers were not also being exploited is certainly apparent. The country was divided on the matter of slavery from the very start - northerners, influenced by Quaker ideals, tended to express the belief that all men are equal under God, whereas white southerners, for what reasons I cannot fathom, tended to express the belief that the color of someone's skin displayed the color of their soul, or something to that poetic effect. Letters from 1775 show that white southerners *believed* slavery to be more profitable, to be a biological necessity, even held some kind of religious concern about it and definitely had concerns that the kingdom ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unintentional Abuse

Questioner: [what do you mean by] Unintentional grooming? Questioner: explain further pls cuz i’ve thought about that but never like- processed it fully >> I am doing my best to avoid getting really psychological here, but the basis of the concept is that the human mind avoids thinking about things that threaten your sense of self and reality. This is a well-documented and extremely strong instinct. So like, people don't automatically assume that they are doing something bad. Nearly every person will seek out and find justifications for everything they do. A 40 yo isn't going to suddenly get up and say, "I've never had an interest in younger people before, but I suddenly want to take advantage of someone's naivety." Becoming an asshole like that is a process shaped by exposure to the abuse of others (not usually direct abuse, surprisingly) and being enabled by social expectations and unfettered access. They do not believe that they are doing anythin...
Post a Comment
Read more