Skip to main content

Flowers for the Abused

Are you familiar with the book "Flowers For Algernon"; where Algernon is the mouse who recieved an experimental treatment before an intellectually disabled man did? For those who aren't, the book is written from the POV of the ID man, and chronicles his intellectual advancement as a result of the treatment, his discovery that the treatment would fail and lead to death (Algernon dies), his subsequent intellectual decline and fears of returning to his previous life, and the end of the book is written like the beginning. it is a problematic book for many reasons, and some people find it triggering.

The reason I brought it up, if you're curious, is that I'm like the main character in that I didn't recognize, for a very, very long time, that the way people treated me as a child and young adult was "bad", abusive. It was a theory of mine that perhaps this was effecting my ability to communicate with the other person, as typically, people reflect the behavior they experience; I'm one of the few people I know of who are obsessed with self-reflection and behavioral improvement based on science and research rather than experience, at least on the scale I have implemented. In other words, the behaviors I choose are *exclusively* created from self-help and psychology books, not copied from TV shows or personal interactions. However, if there are sections of my personality that I've failed to fix, I won't know until situations where people are hurt occur.

(That book also shaped one of my deepest fears - that I will become again unable to determine when people are being cruel to me and return to a world where I constantly get taken advantage of and hurt... I don't know if it's something that can be fully empathized with unless you've read the book, unless you identify so fully with the main character, unless you spent hours crying over Algernon like I did... without that experience, my thoughts may come across as ableist. But ...is a fear of being hurt because of your disability truly ableism?)

The most common method for people to determine whether their behavior is abusive is to determine how they would feel being treated that way. But what if I'm okay with being treated in a way that other people find abusive?

One of the considerations I have to deal with is a serious lack of the ability to recognize my own emotions. I believe this to be a trauma response, as I do *have* emotions, but I simply "turn them off" when they become overwhelming, I believe this to be a kind of dissociative state. Possibly a "fawning" fear response. This is how I mask, and how I deal with pain. Instead, I feel a slight giddiness, possibly it's anxiousness, and am prone to laughing and smiling. Unfortunately, sometimes I cannot turn them back on. At this point, I literally do not emotionally react to any treatment, and I am "ok" with anything. So that method does not work for me. I cannot recognize if I am being abused, so I do not know if I am reflecting abusive behavior.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

interdependence and apples

》 It really saddens me that it only takes one bad apple to ruin a bunch for most people. The reason the saying is, "one bad apple ruins the bushel/barrel" is that because of the way apples rot, they emit a gas that causes all the apples around them to rot as well. When talking about how people interact, a person did not develop their personality by accident or by chance; they were enabled by so many people that there's almost no way of picking out any particular influence. For instance, if you read the book about Trump by his niece, she points out that nearly every troubling behavior he has was initially caused by the extremely high desire he had to earn his own father's affection, and was subsequently reinforced by celebrity-dom and the trappings of wealth. Similarly MLK Jr., who was a reverend for some time before he became a celebrity, was strongly influenced by his own understanding of the Word of God and the unconditional support of his loved ones, ev...

the value of exploitation

》  Income of black slaves? You clearly don’t realize slavery almost abolished itself because of hoe **nonprofitable** it was until the cotton jin Growing cotton has never profited from slavery. In fact, paid laborers were more profitable than slave laborers even after the cotton gin was created; although the question of whether the paid laborers were not also being exploited is certainly apparent. The country was divided on the matter of slavery from the very start - northerners, influenced by Quaker ideals, tended to express the belief that all men are equal under God, whereas white southerners, for what reasons I cannot fathom, tended to express the belief that the color of someone's skin displayed the color of their soul, or something to that poetic effect. Letters from 1775 show that white southerners *believed* slavery to be more profitable, to be a biological necessity, even held some kind of religious concern about it and definitely had concerns that the kingdom ...

Unintentional Abuse

Questioner: [what do you mean by] Unintentional grooming? Questioner: explain further pls cuz i’ve thought about that but never like- processed it fully >> I am doing my best to avoid getting really psychological here, but the basis of the concept is that the human mind avoids thinking about things that threaten your sense of self and reality. This is a well-documented and extremely strong instinct. So like, people don't automatically assume that they are doing something bad. Nearly every person will seek out and find justifications for everything they do. A 40 yo isn't going to suddenly get up and say, "I've never had an interest in younger people before, but I suddenly want to take advantage of someone's naivety." Becoming an asshole like that is a process shaped by exposure to the abuse of others (not usually direct abuse, surprisingly) and being enabled by social expectations and unfettered access. They do not believe that they are doing anythin...