Skip to main content

Donations Versus Taxes: On the topic of School Lunch

Christine Johnson said, on Quora:

I love hearing about someone donating to children, instead of animals. I love animals, but I feel like it’s so sad that people seem to care more for a dog than for a child in our era. Thanks for reminding me there is some human love still out there—as a mom in a very childless area, it is a nice (and a needed) reminder❤️

Children definitely are the future, and making sure they have secure food, housing, and healthcare does so much to make sure they grow up educated and able to think critically. But individual organizations can only do so much - they have such a limited reach - it's not as helpful to give a child a burger if he already has a sandwich, but the child who hasn't eaten since they left school the day before will benefit from either option. Instead, a single-payer system can redistribute funds from one area of the country to somewhere completely different based on area need.

If you frame payment for things like section 8 housing and SNAP as a civic duty, you know, dues for being in the “private club” that is the 3rd most populous country on this planet, then of course it is only natural for every member of this society to support the health and welfare of even the smallest hungry child. We have to start enforcing public control of the government in order to stop letting big business lobbyists redirect our tax money and legislation away from the people who actually need it. The provision of school lunch, regular medical services, and basic general college education to all citizens needs to join K-12 schooling as a civic duty, a patriotic commitment to the country's future growth.

(Note: I would say that we could simply add more material to college prerequisite courses like high school, but unfortunately public school is already so overwhelmingly loaded with material that teenagers are already experiencing burnout at continuously increasing rates. It would help if history and science classes taught the correct thing the first time, so you didn't spend so much effort re-learning everything in later classes, but it would also help if we taught concepts and critical thinking skills rather than test questions. I have had the entirety of Wikipedia downloaded onto an ebook reader, and before that, a PC, for the last fifteen years. I don't need to have memorized the day of the month that Julius Caesar was killed, but it is of far greater importance to me, at this time, to remember, that Rome fell because of the gap between the rich and poor classes inherent in capitalism, lack of financial support from the upper classes for infrastructure like roads and water pipes, and military overspending inherent in militaristic imperialism - and this is not something I learned in school.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

interdependence and apples

》 It really saddens me that it only takes one bad apple to ruin a bunch for most people. The reason the saying is, "one bad apple ruins the bushel/barrel" is that because of the way apples rot, they emit a gas that causes all the apples around them to rot as well. When talking about how people interact, a person did not develop their personality by accident or by chance; they were enabled by so many people that there's almost no way of picking out any particular influence. For instance, if you read the book about Trump by his niece, she points out that nearly every troubling behavior he has was initially caused by the extremely high desire he had to earn his own father's affection, and was subsequently reinforced by celebrity-dom and the trappings of wealth. Similarly MLK Jr., who was a reverend for some time before he became a celebrity, was strongly influenced by his own understanding of the Word of God and the unconditional support of his loved ones, ev...

the value of exploitation

》  Income of black slaves? You clearly don’t realize slavery almost abolished itself because of hoe **nonprofitable** it was until the cotton jin Growing cotton has never profited from slavery. In fact, paid laborers were more profitable than slave laborers even after the cotton gin was created; although the question of whether the paid laborers were not also being exploited is certainly apparent. The country was divided on the matter of slavery from the very start - northerners, influenced by Quaker ideals, tended to express the belief that all men are equal under God, whereas white southerners, for what reasons I cannot fathom, tended to express the belief that the color of someone's skin displayed the color of their soul, or something to that poetic effect. Letters from 1775 show that white southerners *believed* slavery to be more profitable, to be a biological necessity, even held some kind of religious concern about it and definitely had concerns that the kingdom ...

Unintentional Abuse

Questioner: [what do you mean by] Unintentional grooming? Questioner: explain further pls cuz i’ve thought about that but never like- processed it fully >> I am doing my best to avoid getting really psychological here, but the basis of the concept is that the human mind avoids thinking about things that threaten your sense of self and reality. This is a well-documented and extremely strong instinct. So like, people don't automatically assume that they are doing something bad. Nearly every person will seek out and find justifications for everything they do. A 40 yo isn't going to suddenly get up and say, "I've never had an interest in younger people before, but I suddenly want to take advantage of someone's naivety." Becoming an asshole like that is a process shaped by exposure to the abuse of others (not usually direct abuse, surprisingly) and being enabled by social expectations and unfettered access. They do not believe that they are doing anythin...